Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 10(8): e003306, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28808091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preparticipation screening for cardiovascular disease in young athletes with electrocardiography is endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology and several major sporting organizations. One of the concerns of the ECG as a screening test in young athletes relates to the potential for variation in interpretation. We investigated the degree of variation in ECG interpretation in athletes and its financial impact among cardiologists of differing experience. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight cardiologists (4 with experience in screening athletes) each reported 400 ECGs of consecutively screened young athletes according to the 2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations, Seattle criteria, and refined criteria. Cohen κ coefficient was used to calculate interobserver reliability. Cardiologists proposed secondary investigations after ECG interpretation, the costs of which were based on the UK National Health Service tariffs. Inexperienced cardiologists were more likely to classify an ECG as abnormal compared with experienced cardiologists (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.02). Modification of ECG interpretation criteria improved interobserver reliability for categorizing an ECG as abnormal from poor (2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations; κ=0.15) to moderate (refined criteria; κ=0.41) among inexperienced cardiologists; however, interobserver reliability was moderate for all 3 criteria among experienced cardiologists (κ=0.40-0.53). Inexperienced cardiologists were more likely to refer athletes for further evaluation compared with experienced cardiologists (odds ratio, 4.74; 95% confidence interval, 3.50-6.43) with poorer interobserver reliability (κ=0.22 versus κ=0.47). Interobserver reliability for secondary investigations after ECG interpretation ranged from poor to fair among inexperienced cardiologists (κ=0.15-0.30) and fair to moderate among experienced cardiologists (κ=0.21-0.46). The cost of cardiovascular evaluation per athlete was $175 (95% confidence interval, $142-$228) and $101 (95% confidence interval, $83-$131) for inexperienced and experienced cardiologists, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the ECG in athletes and the resultant cascade of investigations are highly physician dependent even in experienced hands with important downstream financial implications, emphasizing the need for formal training and standardized diagnostic pathways.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/economia , Atletas , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Eletrocardiografia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicações , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidade , Competência Clínica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
2.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 38(8): 475-483, oct. 2015. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-143127

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las dilataciones vasculares intrapulmonares (DVIPu) están consideradas una complicación de la cirrosis. La ecocardiografía con contraste (ETTc) es la técnica de elección para su diagnóstico. El objetivo de este estudio es demostrar que el doppler transcraneal con contraste (DTCc) puede servir para el diagnóstico de las DVIPu. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron consecutivamente pacientes evaluados para trasplante hepático. Estudio transversal con enmascaramiento de la prueba de referencia (ETTc) para quien interpreta la prueba a valorar (DTCc). Analizamos la exactitud de la prueba diagnóstica mediante los valores de sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo, y razón de verosimilitud. RESULTADOS: Por DTCc (n = 43) existía shunt derecha-izquierda en 23 pacientes (62,2%): 4 precoces, 2 indeterminados y 17 tardíos. Diecinueve (51,4%) casos fueron clasificados DVIPu. Con ETTc (n = 37) 10 estudios (27%) fueron negativos para shunt y 27 (73%) positivos, 21 (56,8%) fueron compatibles con DVIPu. Los pacientes con y sin DVIPu no diferían en edad, sexo, etiología, gravedad o índice de MELD, independientemente del método diagnóstico. En el estudio de validez diagnóstica (n = 37) del DTCc frente a la ETTc, el rendimiento diagnóstico fue AUC = 0,813% (IC 95%: 0,666-0,959; p = 0,001), sensibilidad: 76,2% (IC 95%: 54,9-89,4) y especificidad: 90% (IC 95%: 63,9-96,5). Razón de verosimilitud positiva: 6,095. CONCLUSIONES: Demostramos una alta prevalencia de DVIPu en candidatos a trasplante hepático. La probabilidad que tiene el DTCc en detectar DVIPu cuando se observa shunt derecha-izquierda tardío con recirculación es muy elevada, y con pocos falsos positivos. Al ser una técnica previamente no descrita en este contexto, deben llevarse a cabo estudios similares con fin comparativo


INTRODUCTION: Intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVD) are considered a complication of cirrhosis. The technique of choice for their diagnosis is contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CEE). The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (CETD) in the diagnosis of IPVD. METHOD: We consecutively included patients evaluated for liver transplantation. A cross-sectional study was conducted. The investigator interpreting CETD was blind to the results of the gold standard (CEE). The accuracy of the diagnostic test was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio. RESULTS: CETD (n = 43) showed a right-to-left shunt in 23 patients (62.2%): 4 early, 2 indeterminate and 17 late. Nineteen (51,4%) cases were classified as IPVD. With CEE (n = 37), 10 procedures (27%) were negative for shunt, 27 (73%) were positive, and 21 (56.8%) were compatible with IPVD. Patients with and without IPVD showed no differences in age, sex, etiology, severity, or MELD score, independently of the diagnostic test. In the diagnostic validity study (n = 37) of CETD versus CEE, the AUC for diagnostic yield was 0.813% (95% CI: 0.666-0.959; P = .001), sensitivity was 76.2% (95% CI: 54.9-89.4) and specificity was 90% (95% CI: 63.9-96.5). The positive likelihood ratio was 6.095. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of IPVD in candidates for liver transplantation. When a late right-to-left shunt with recirculation is observed, CETD has a high probability of detecting IPVD, with few false-positive results. Because this technique has not previously been described in this indication, similar studies are needed for comparison


Assuntos
Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Ultrassonografia Doppler Transcraniana/métodos , Síndrome Hepatopulmonar , Dilatação Patológica/fisiopatologia , Transplante de Fígado , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Transversais
3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 38(8): 475-83, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25841632

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVD) are considered a complication of cirrhosis. The technique of choice for their diagnosis is contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CEE). The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (CETD) in the diagnosis of IPVD. METHOD: We consecutively included patients evaluated for liver transplantation. A cross-sectional study was conducted. The investigator interpreting CETD was blind to the results of the gold standard (CEE). The accuracy of the diagnostic test was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio. RESULTS: CETD (n=43) showed a right-to-left shunt in 23 patients (62.2%): 4 early, 2 indeterminate and 17 late. Nineteen (51,4%) cases were classified as IPVD. With CEE (n=37), 10 procedures (27%) were negative for shunt, 27 (73%) were positive, and 21 (56.8%) were compatible with IPVD. Patients with and without IPVD showed no differences in age, sex, etiology, severity, or MELD score, independently of the diagnostic test. In the diagnostic validity study (n=37) of CETD versus CEE, the AUC for diagnostic yield was 0.813% (95%CI: 0.666-0.959; P=.001), sensitivity was 76.2% (95%CI: 54.9-89.4) and specificity was 90% (95%CI: 63.9-96.5). The positive likelihood ratio was 6.095. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of IPVD in candidates for liver transplantation. When a late right-to-left shunt with recirculation is observed, CETD has a high probability of detecting IPVD, with few false-positive results. Because this technique has not previously been described in this indication, similar studies are needed for comparison.


Assuntos
Capilares/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Hepatopulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Circulação Pulmonar , Ultrassonografia Doppler Transcraniana , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Capilares/patologia , Meios de Contraste , Estudos Transversais , Dilatação Patológica , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Síndrome Hepatopulmonar/epidemiologia , Síndrome Hepatopulmonar/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Microbolhas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Método Simples-Cego , Manobra de Valsalva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...